18 Comments

I was aware of the outcome but hadn't read the full judgment until encouraged to do so by this excellent summary. Paragraph 19 should be sufficient to scuttle the reputation of Garden Court Chambers; I don't think I've ever read a more damning account of incompetence. As for Stonewall, employing harassment, intimidation and threats to promote its ideology not only invalidates that ideology, but is also surely incompatible with continuing charitable status.

Expand full comment

Thanks for doing this Sarah. It feels surreal to have it all there, in black and white, and yet the TRA numpties are still bouncing around Twitter convinced that Stonewall won.

Expand full comment

Stonewall is now in serious trouble because Boards aren’t full of TRAs, they are full of risk averse and finance focussed people. Seeing Stonewall’s skiddy underpants displayed for the public will lead to an exodus I suspect 😃

Expand full comment

Thanks for this Sarah. It's brilliant.

Expand full comment

Thanks so much for compiling this "best of".

Expand full comment

So many excellent points highlighted - thanks v much.

Expand full comment

The Bad Law Project concern me. Some very obnoxious and downright odious characters. They seem to be getting overly excited about their reach and are using ‘freedom of speech’ to actually close discussion that opposes their dangerously far-right and conspiracy theorist positions.

Expand full comment
Removed (Banned)Jul 28, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment