Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nick Langford's avatar

I was aware of the outcome but hadn't read the full judgment until encouraged to do so by this excellent summary. Paragraph 19 should be sufficient to scuttle the reputation of Garden Court Chambers; I don't think I've ever read a more damning account of incompetence. As for Stonewall, employing harassment, intimidation and threats to promote its ideology not only invalidates that ideology, but is also surely incompatible with continuing charitable status.

Expand full comment
Martin Eggleston's avatar

Thanks for doing this Sarah. It feels surreal to have it all there, in black and white, and yet the TRA numpties are still bouncing around Twitter convinced that Stonewall won.

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts