What a disgusting thoughtless competition prize Sarah, not only currently some families are struggling to afford food each day or gas/electric etc you then tweet that. Why don’t you donate £500 to a worthy charity if you have money to give away.
There is clear evidence of your conduct bringing the profession into disrepute. From my understanding of the guidance from BSB, imho you have breached the condo of conduct many many times tbh and it’s about time you faced the consequences of your outright malicious, abusive and threatening statements that you have directed at so many individuals. You have posted online and in public on many occasions extremely transphobic comments. You have also clearly posted online without a doubt antisemitic comments and images which mock and demean the atrocities that all victims of the Holocaust endured but especially Jewish victims. There is so much evidence that I’m sure would be of assistance to demonstrate to the BSB the extent of your abhorrent conduct. Furthermore there is also many occasions where you have used your position as a barrister to intimidate, belittle and attack any individual that challenges your actions. I shall be contacting the BSB on Monday not only to make a complaint but also your online activity regarding this matter
Oh, I’m far from too late. I waited for you to send your email until 4pm your time and I immediately responded to your request at 3:18 pm. Someone found it for me when you reneged and you received that information at 4:07 pm. Not that your binding offer had a time limit.
It’s ok. I know how to write a mandamus. I’m also positive I have someone to file it for me and attach it to your existing case. I was figuring it would play out this way.
Not that you’ll accept biological reality extends well beyond phenotype (it’s arguably hilarious the amount of cognitive dissonance in this when you also argue women are more than a vagina and ovaries and breasts), not that your offer of £500 is anything other than peak disingenuity as you’ve preconditioned a stance of obstinate denial, so I’ll disregard that part because I don’t believe you have the honor necessary to put your money where your mouth is. However, I’ll be happy to answer your question honestly all the same.
You’re absolutely correct in stating we are all more than the some total of our parts alone. There exists within most a deeper connection with gender and the lens that connection provides in viewing and experiencing life. Those who don’t have this connection with gender and how it relates to them need to spend a significant amount of alone time being honest with themselves about themselves. If in this you find you truly have no gender connection then you fall within a spectrum of non-binary, even if you choose to not accept this inseparable reality between your physical and metaphysical self.
By reducing trans women to just the sex organs with which they were born, while rejecting all other equally valid qualities which define us, you perpetuate that stance of which you are so adamantly opposed when applying to yourself. By denying our reality and supplanting your own, you exude the type of ignorance described as mind reading fallacy. You have no way of accurately describing the inner most workings of another’s being. You can only juxtapose your own situation to ours. This false equivalency bolsters your willful ignorance.
So, to answer your question, there was no need to go further in finding three tweets which violated this moral sanctity than the first three you posted. By stating trans women are men you deny our lives reality. You propagate the myth that women are nothing more than birthers. Further, you slight a whole community with which you obviously have little to no actual knowledge. You reduce us to nothing more than our genitals while ignoring every single other marker to the contrary. In so doing, you do the same to all people, including yourself.
To be clear, this isn’t a debate. I’m not open to discussing in detail how everything about us other than the body we were born into is female. It’s here in this space only for you to finally accept and just get over yourself, or to continue along the path of irrationality. That is left to you and has absolutely no effect on the very real fact that we are women.
I’m not a hard feelings type and if it had been worded differently I would have been happy to take the L just in knowing you now know why they’re worthy. As a barrister though I’m sure you already did. Nothing personal but a girl has to do what a girl has to do. I truly hope you have a good day.
Oh. I see what you mean. As this plays out I’d like you to remember it’s important to be aware of your wording. You said which of these tweet was “worthy of” sanctioning. The fact is, all of them are worthy.
So it’s 4 now. I’ve waited patiently since 3:18. I’ll give you 3 hours, until 7pm your time, to provide your email or remit payment through PayPal to the email address provided (which is more secure for both of us and still provides record of payment while also being far less expensive). After that, I’ll have to peruse the mandamus and already have someone knowledgeable who is happy to file it on my behalf. Have a wonderful day, Sarah.
3:18pm your time I’ve requested your email here and through your DM on Twitter. I have the information you requested copied and ready to paste as soon as I receive your email address.
What a disgusting thoughtless competition prize Sarah, not only currently some families are struggling to afford food each day or gas/electric etc you then tweet that. Why don’t you donate £500 to a worthy charity if you have money to give away.
There is clear evidence of your conduct bringing the profession into disrepute. From my understanding of the guidance from BSB, imho you have breached the condo of conduct many many times tbh and it’s about time you faced the consequences of your outright malicious, abusive and threatening statements that you have directed at so many individuals. You have posted online and in public on many occasions extremely transphobic comments. You have also clearly posted online without a doubt antisemitic comments and images which mock and demean the atrocities that all victims of the Holocaust endured but especially Jewish victims. There is so much evidence that I’m sure would be of assistance to demonstrate to the BSB the extent of your abhorrent conduct. Furthermore there is also many occasions where you have used your position as a barrister to intimidate, belittle and attack any individual that challenges your actions. I shall be contacting the BSB on Monday not only to make a complaint but also your online activity regarding this matter
Oh, I’m far from too late. I waited for you to send your email until 4pm your time and I immediately responded to your request at 3:18 pm. Someone found it for me when you reneged and you received that information at 4:07 pm. Not that your binding offer had a time limit.
It’s ok. I know how to write a mandamus. I’m also positive I have someone to file it for me and attach it to your existing case. I was figuring it would play out this way.
Not that you’ll accept biological reality extends well beyond phenotype (it’s arguably hilarious the amount of cognitive dissonance in this when you also argue women are more than a vagina and ovaries and breasts), not that your offer of £500 is anything other than peak disingenuity as you’ve preconditioned a stance of obstinate denial, so I’ll disregard that part because I don’t believe you have the honor necessary to put your money where your mouth is. However, I’ll be happy to answer your question honestly all the same.
You’re absolutely correct in stating we are all more than the some total of our parts alone. There exists within most a deeper connection with gender and the lens that connection provides in viewing and experiencing life. Those who don’t have this connection with gender and how it relates to them need to spend a significant amount of alone time being honest with themselves about themselves. If in this you find you truly have no gender connection then you fall within a spectrum of non-binary, even if you choose to not accept this inseparable reality between your physical and metaphysical self.
By reducing trans women to just the sex organs with which they were born, while rejecting all other equally valid qualities which define us, you perpetuate that stance of which you are so adamantly opposed when applying to yourself. By denying our reality and supplanting your own, you exude the type of ignorance described as mind reading fallacy. You have no way of accurately describing the inner most workings of another’s being. You can only juxtapose your own situation to ours. This false equivalency bolsters your willful ignorance.
So, to answer your question, there was no need to go further in finding three tweets which violated this moral sanctity than the first three you posted. By stating trans women are men you deny our lives reality. You propagate the myth that women are nothing more than birthers. Further, you slight a whole community with which you obviously have little to no actual knowledge. You reduce us to nothing more than our genitals while ignoring every single other marker to the contrary. In so doing, you do the same to all people, including yourself.
To be clear, this isn’t a debate. I’m not open to discussing in detail how everything about us other than the body we were born into is female. It’s here in this space only for you to finally accept and just get over yourself, or to continue along the path of irrationality. That is left to you and has absolutely no effect on the very real fact that we are women.
The BSB is captured, negligent and ignorant of the law non-shocka.
I don't tweet, but if I do, I'll know how to do it based on this laundry list.
And how to defend against ridiculous professional licensing review.
I’m not a hard feelings type and if it had been worded differently I would have been happy to take the L just in knowing you now know why they’re worthy. As a barrister though I’m sure you already did. Nothing personal but a girl has to do what a girl has to do. I truly hope you have a good day.
Oh. I see what you mean. As this plays out I’d like you to remember it’s important to be aware of your wording. You said which of these tweet was “worthy of” sanctioning. The fact is, all of them are worthy.
So it’s 4 now. I’ve waited patiently since 3:18. I’ll give you 3 hours, until 7pm your time, to provide your email or remit payment through PayPal to the email address provided (which is more secure for both of us and still provides record of payment while also being far less expensive). After that, I’ll have to peruse the mandamus and already have someone knowledgeable who is happy to file it on my behalf. Have a wonderful day, Sarah.
3:55. I’ve still as of yet not received your email address. For obvious reasons I’m not publicly posting my banking details.
3:41. Are you just waiting for your offer to time out? I’m closely watching this for a reply as well as my DM inbox on Twitter.
3:18pm your time I’ve requested your email here and through your DM on Twitter. I have the information you requested copied and ready to paste as soon as I receive your email address.
I narrowed it down to 8, but I suspect, given that I'm forced to pick 3, I'd go with:
26/9(a)
2/10/20 (h)
29/11/20, 1(b)
Is this like Wordle?