Is a charity that seeks a 'strategic litigation specialist', ignores evidence and focuses on the welfare of its income streams, really best placed to advocate for the needs of vulnerable children?
Or suing the Charity Commission for registering a charitable organisation as a charity, especially if that organisation only has 3 initials in it's name
Thanks for the heads up. Think I'll apply. I can identify as a strategic lawyer as well as then next man (and its bound to be a man).
Or woman identifying as a man, would that count?
Good point. I'd best identify as a MALE strategic lawyer.
"the wishes and feelings of a 4 year old carry the same currency as do those of a 16 year old." A common attitude amongst 'predatory males'. REDFLAG!
By “strategic litigation” does that mean suing charities in case people donate to them instead of to Mermaids?
Yes, defending the racket from accountability at all costs, kinda how Savile used libel threats.
Or suing the Charity Commission for registering a charitable organisation as a charity, especially if that organisation only has 3 initials in it's name