6 Comments
User's avatar
Ian Bourns's avatar

Excellent letter that lays out clearly and concisely the gender critical legal position that the standards board should be cognisant of.

It does expose the risk that an over emphasised ideological approach to EDI within the board would be both counterproductive and potentially drive illegal behaviour and thus subsequent legal challenge the outcome of which could bring the board, through its own actions, into disrepute.

Expand full comment
Daniel Howard James's avatar

It seems to me that activists have conflated having a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 with being protected from reality. In fact, most people have at least one protected characteristic; it doesn't make you special.

Expand full comment
Sarah Phillimore's avatar

That is I think exactly what has happened here.

Expand full comment
Oli Blah blah's avatar

Genderism poisons everything, no institution seems to be able to function properly once infected.

Expand full comment
Me's avatar

#TransIsALie

No-one is trans. They may be transsexual or an AGP, still male, still XY, but NIT transgender. Tgat's all in their minds. Not biological reality, and shame on all who affirm them,or condone their lunacy, considering the harm it's causing women, children, gays and lesbians. #ShameOnThem

Expand full comment
Lola Coco Petrovski's avatar

It's a disgraceful waste of your valuable time. Thankyou for going in to bat for us women, and taking on the deluded bullies.

Expand full comment