Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ruby lescott's avatar

Thank you for this clear explanation. Would a case against AA themselves have been possible instead? (Just thinking about future battles!) Will certainly contribute again if needed, such bravery must be supported and this is about all of us.

Expand full comment
Ruth Livingstone's avatar

Is it a given that she will have to pay the defendant’s costs? Does the judge have some discretion here, particularly given the late disclosures and the protracted nature of the case as a result?

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts